• Warning!

    Some articles contain revolutionary terms that others might find offensive. Common street language is sometimes employed.
  • And!

    If you came here thinking I'm writing things that I think people will love, and nothing else, I'm afraid you're in the wrong place. This site is about facts and realities, how I interpret them. Yours are welcome, don't cower, don't be shy.
  • It is here free!

    Right of Reply is good. But the proposed law is, in fact, already rendered obsolete by here! Bring it out in here why somebody made a mistake of labeling you a moron.
  • Recent Comments

    The Joint Aquino… on ARMM, Peacetalks & Malacañ…
    The Joint Aquino… on Peace and Unity in Mindan…
    Rod on Classroom Backlog, Rice Import…
    backlink checker on What’s with Mr Garcia…
    doroastig on New Year!
    doroastig on New Year!
    RLTJ'sRod on Classroom Backlog, Rice Import…
  • On Comments

    This site does not believe in comment moderation. However, comment should be regular in form that Akismet will not hold them as spam. As a rule, it is policy of this site to delete any or all "spam" for web system's protection.
  • Dont end here!

  • Do you know that

    If all your life you have always aspired and you think the one on top is no good, you must think again. Maybe you are no better. Or maybe you look worse!.. Or, why not think God. You're good but he loves you. You could end up that egotist stooge you hate in the mirror.
  • A small thief and a big thief are the same. They are both thieves... Uh uh, OK, we have a small thief and a big thief - they are not exactly the same... size.
  • People don't know good until they have seen bad, or they don't know bad, did not have any idea about bad, until they've seen good. Before all them could be hollow strings of words. [Tumen's doctrine]
  • Gagged people can sometimes be as dangerous as the non-reasonable. [Right of Reply]
  • One thing is always better than nothing. [When hope is gone; Kapit sa patalim.]
  • There will always be something better or advanced than the thing. [Law of Dialectic]
  • Putting down good or perceived good you lose. If good puts you down you lose as well. Try to be good. [Politics and propaganda]
  • Tyranny and rape belong to the same set of mind. They believe and look at themselves as too good.
  • When a person has lost credibility the best thing for him is to stop issuing statements because politically he has already lost any and all arguments. [Everything to a person - Integrity]
  • If truth can bring you down you must be stood on weak or false ground. If lie can bring you down then you must be stood on worse than scum!
  • Have you ever thought

    "True" church or true religion is a squabble between theists. Whatever it is people believe in must be of no problem to God. I bet He can speak very well the language of any man - any creature, actually. [A Universal God]
  • A man's gain may be another man's loss. A man's happiness may be another man's woe. A man's ease may be another man's sacrifice and misery.[Expropriation/Profiteering/Bureaucrat capitalism/Government corruption]
  • To err is human. That’s why it is not good habit to drop God’s name just to drive the self. It might be standing stinking shit aside Him. [Cashing-in on the gullible]

  • Man has sometimes relegated God to a mule. Religion and State need to separate. [Religions in politics]
  • Heroes are remembered for their greatness. The bad sides of them are all in the hidden files and folders. Villains are the other way around. Nobody is perfect.
  • Except for being a figure of speech, nothing is really absolute.
  • Some people are hard headed. They cannot be told once. Well, try and try again, who knows. [Big names that flopped in politics]

NFA Saving the Day, Ningas Cogon or Real?

The Philippines is a TRADITIONAL IMPORTER of cereal (rice, corn, wheat) so this rice shortage is nothing new and abnormal. For and against, the hypes in Media made it easy for what Traders want…jack up prices of agricultural commodities, riding the global trend even before its actual effect has reached this shore. With the mind of consumers already preconditioned, price increase, not only of rice, has never been this accepted by the public without much uproar. Squeeze the masses right on, they’ll always somehow find something to buy food!

Food price increase has already been happening in countries with biofuels industries in place but it should be noted that in the Philippines the program is barely in the drawing board to possibly actually affect everything at present.

Bandila (ABS-CBN) reported last night that it is now farmers that dictate price to traders. Like it is now happening all-over our countrysides. This is ridiculous distortion, a myth being hyped. Maybe media should always add “allegedly”, “reportedly” or the likes and effects in their report instead of being unwittingly (?) becoming party to disinformation and/or distortion.

People were not born yesterday. Rice trading in this country is an established system and order. When a poor farmer brings one or two cavans of Palay to the market, whether he likes the price or not, he must sell. He cannot afford to bring the Palay back to the farm, or go home without salt, vetsin, dried fish, kerosene, matches, tobacco, and other basics that you can imagine poor family needs. It’s all traders’ (sometimes series of middlemen) game from there and NOT farmers. Most Filipino farmers no longer own their produce, partial or total, long before harvest due to non-government, traditional lending system. This is the general situation of Filipino farmers. NFA support palay price for farmers is mostly availed by traders presenting as farmers. Sure, many of them have rights to call themselves farmers, too. From farmers go to traders and from there Palay goes either to the private sector or to the NFA. From the NFA, milled palay or rice goes back to traders who passed them as NFA rice, and yes, illegally passed them on as commercial rice at whooping profit! Check that out and learn why.

The observations by no less VP Noli de Castro and Agriculture secretary Arthur Yap that there is no rice shortage, in fact, is never been wrong. People can see it everywhere; there is plenty of rice stock in market places. Why people line retail outlets, it is because of CHEAPER NFA rice and not because of no more rice. NFA rice sells around P18.00/kg and commercial rice range from P35-40.00/kg. U.S. rice imported by NFA are estimated at P25.00/kg. Right now we have a situation short of an Ultra Stampede for NFA rice out there. Because sale is limited, one can see wife, the husband, their children in queues.

The crack down by government of traders in the wholesale-retail of NFA rice recently, is nothing new. National Foods Authority (NFA) rice being passed as commercial rice is something perennial. Collusion of Traders and NFA authorities is as old as the National Grains Authority (NGA). And we see no end to that. The Philippines is known as the most corrupt country in the world today that has not sent, figuratively, a crook to jail. The corrupt cannot be jailed because of corruption! No wonder we don’t have national discipline. [I had been in U.S. territory where I had observed people living on food stamps. In there food stamps are food stamps. Here, dole-out fertilizer can become liquor, cigarettes, anything.]

Hype or no hype I think we had these price increases coming sooner or later. We are a free economy and there is nothing legal to brake traders except NATURAL LAW of SUPPLY AND DEMAND, which is effective only in situations where there is free, wide and true competition. This economic policy, as people see now, is inutile where there exist private monopolies and cartels. In that case it is manipulation and whim, and not supply and demand that is at play – artificial shortage of supply and, as we see, near stampede by consumers.

In a free economy, hypes are in fact flimsy excuses that traders or anybody can do without. Everyone is free, take or leave. Incidentally we are dealing here with foods that people cannot do without. People have no choice but to take, unlike cars and jewelries that they can do without or leave.

The government is never wrong about activating the NFA more, in the retail of rice. It has somehow helped stabilize the price of rice. This has somehow provided competition in the business. Question is how long government can sustain the operation that maybe should be pushed further to be felt by the market. NFA is the only thing that stands between the already miserable Filipino masses and the Pinoy trade ‘Mafia’ today.

There has been an idea floated that NFA should adjust its prices a little bit up. To strengthen and to sustain operation, and to be fair competition with the private sector, I think, yes. Normally many businesses out there actually, operate around 30-35% Gross Profit (GP). Maybe NFA should evolve near that figure whatever would be the final outcome of the prices of its rice. If masses can not afford the prices I’m sure there must be trouble somewhere else.

Some inter-actions made elsewhere that I think are related to the problem here:

rltjs Says: February 27, 2008 at 5:28 pm Modified

I am in the third world and my impression is that much of the Earth’s agricultural resource -land, is underdeveloped. Hunger in my part of the world is not caused by shrinking land but rather by: lack of industries and jobs, almost slave wages, and estimated 75% of our agri-potential has yet to be developed. Farmers are ill motivated by poor prices. Practically, we don’t have things like subsidies for farmers.

Unlike the advanced countries, improved prices of agricultural produce expected by bio-fuels craze here hopefully will change the situation for us.

Jeremy Says: February 27, 2008 at 5:33 pm

Interesting point – the switch to biofuels may put an end to the huge US surpluses that swamp the markets with cheap grain in some poorer parts of the world. That would be a good thing ultimately, but it may mean several years of shortages until that 75% starts producing enough to make up the shortfall.

Some people do stand to gain from high food prices. The people who’ll benefit the most will be poorer countries with a food surplus, who will suddenly see their exports worth more.

RLTJ Says: February 28, 2008 at 3:50 pm

I am not really sure about poor countries having food surplus. I only know we have plenty of idle lands. The Philippines IS a traditional cereal IMPORTER. We are traditional rice, corn and wheat importer. We import corn from U.S.A. We do import rice from other Asian countries so I guess they have surplus on that.

RLTJ Says: March 16, 2008 at 3:10 am Modified

The world is dependent on fuel and energy and dictated by forces that control them. Fuels have gone unusually high in relation to everything else. The introduction of bio-fuels uncovers the fact that agricultural products when or if converted to fuels will pay more.

In a free economy, nobody can tell farmers if or when they convert their corn, for example, to energy instead of feeding them to livestock. Solution to the problem apparently is, either Free States subsidize or increase subsidy to farmers, or otherwise it is time that States should initiate socialized trading in selective agriculture and/or in energy to affect possible better price to (producers) farmers and bring possible lower price to consumers. Trading: American, Russian, Red Chinese, they speak only one universal language – Capitalist systemBuy low Sell high and man in the street cannot do anything about it.

NFA to save the day, Ningas Cogon or for real?

Advertisements

One Response

  1. I was out to Ever Gotesco this afternoon. On the way back, the jeepney that I was riding made a stop in front of the Kristong Hari church located across the New Commonwealth Market. Of all places, we found ourselves staring at a large crowd that queued from the sidewalk and going into the church premise where, unmistakably, NFA rice was being distributed.

    The jeepney driver seemed could not keep his thoughts to himself and he had these remarks: Synthesized

    That, Government, by rationing rice at 3 kg per person, is making life hard for the people; That it fosters the fears that there is indeed a shortage of rice, or a rice crisis.

    What followed was political ranting by him directed at evil of only one person, guess who, but I guess he just was expressing himself. I think I agree with the jeepney driver on those two points:

    If a family wants 10 kgs of rice there are 3 in the family who probably have joined the line bloating the size of the queue. Maybe NFA should liberalize the distribution of rice. Everyday poor do not have much for rice in their pockets, anyway. P50.00, P100.00, P200.00, how much do you think?

    Some interactions made elsewhere. Modified

    RLTJ: April 16th, 2008 at 10:11 am

    Filipinos cannot live without rice. I think State should be rigid in preserving our Rice lands. Identifying and non-conversion of them to other uses must include no ifs and no buts.

    I hate to repeat what I have ranted elsewhere that I think we are crazy people making crazy laws. We have prime arable lands that are now howling subdivisions, commercial centers and golf courses. Our laws not only allowed them but it is our laws that HAVE CAUSED THEM. It reminds us of laws like ‘Total Log Ban’ that totally killed our forests! Right now people are out there beating drums for stiffer penalties for rice hoarders and the likes. Is not that crazy when we cannot even send them to jail for a day? A conviction and a year in jail are absolutely better than death penalty that hanged nobody!

    We are not so fortunate as the Thais and the Vietnamese when it comes to wetland Rice lands. Other than our existing Rice lands, I think Filipinos should focus at developing our vast, up-land AGRICULTURAL territories… More income for the people… Money, and more money, in their pockets…More buying power…Power to buy rice… It’s all the same.

    [I agree that we Filipinos need to look harder into our resources. Many do not understand why some countries which are more populated and with winter season still manage to have rice surplus. Rice production in the Philippines can be three (3) crops per year but not with our river beds more and more becoming dry most time of the year.]

    Also, you’re right. It’s not about the traders that are at fault. Somebody has to do the job of serving people – bringing services to and from people. But there have to be rules to follow making it fair for all. ‘Leveling the playing field’ they keep saying that there. But we have people who act like sila na lang ang mga anak ng Diyos. What follows that is corruption. Laws are circumvented. The end is widespread misery.

    Not everybody is in the position to exploit or to corrupt. So, I guess people have to watch in the right, likely places. Who’s at the cross hairs is incidental.

    RLTJ: April 17th, 2008 at 11:42 pm

    News: Government (DOJ) to prosecute rice hoarders.

    I cannot imagine how they’ll do that. Can anybody imagine how will that be? What constitutes Rice Hoarding? A Big bodega filled with rice? Of course rice needs warehouse! Rice must be kept in warehouse!

    Can somebody please educate us about this law or laws against rice hoarding? Is there a law that tells trader how often should he or must he deliver to retail stores? What if he feels sleepy and he is not in the mood to deliver yet?

    Is not the law or laws against rice hoarding, in fact a Burloloy? And is not pursuing a burloloy kind of law, in fact, another form of grandstanding as nothing comes out in the end?

    News: Some local government units declared a stop to any movement of rice.

    First and last time this measure was imposed was in the rice crisis of 1972 during martial law. Are governors allowed to make such laws now? If a family lives in Metro Manila and they have a farm lot in the province cultivated to rice and they are bringing rice with them to Metro Manila., do local governments have rights to detain the family because they will not depart, not without their rice? Must they be forced to go without their rice? Is not that like being robbed?

    I think strengthening the NFA, giving the private sector fair but stiff competition, is all that we Filipinos need. Other than that is Burloloy.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: