• Warning!

    Some articles contain revolutionary terms that others might find offensive. Common street language is sometimes employed.
  • And!

    If you came here thinking I'm writing things that I think people will love, and nothing else, I'm afraid you're in the wrong place. This site is about facts and realities, how I interpret them. Yours are welcome, don't cower, don't be shy.
  • It is here free!

    Right of Reply is good. But the proposed law is, in fact, already rendered obsolete by here! Bring it out in here why somebody made a mistake of labeling you a moron.
  • Recent Comments

    The Joint Aquino… on ARMM, Peacetalks & Malacañ…
    The Joint Aquino… on Peace and Unity in Mindan…
    Rod on Classroom Backlog, Rice Import…
    backlink checker on What’s with Mr Garcia…
    doroastig on New Year!
    doroastig on New Year!
    RLTJ'sRod on Classroom Backlog, Rice Import…
  • On Comments

    This site does not believe in comment moderation. However, comment should be regular in form that Akismet will not hold them as spam. As a rule, it is policy of this site to delete any or all "spam" for web system's protection.
  • Dont end here!

  • Do you know that

    If all your life you have always aspired and you think the one on top is no good, you must think again. Maybe you are no better. Or maybe you look worse!.. Or, why not think God. You're good but he loves you. You could end up that egotist stooge you hate in the mirror.
  • A small thief and a big thief are the same. They are both thieves... Uh uh, OK, we have a small thief and a big thief - they are not exactly the same... size.
  • People don't know good until they have seen bad, or they don't know bad, did not have any idea about bad, until they've seen good. Before all them could be hollow strings of words. [Tumen's doctrine]
  • Gagged people can sometimes be as dangerous as the non-reasonable. [Right of Reply]
  • One thing is always better than nothing. [When hope is gone; Kapit sa patalim.]
  • There will always be something better or advanced than the thing. [Law of Dialectic]
  • Putting down good or perceived good you lose. If good puts you down you lose as well. Try to be good. [Politics and propaganda]
  • Tyranny and rape belong to the same set of mind. They believe and look at themselves as too good.
  • When a person has lost credibility the best thing for him is to stop issuing statements because politically he has already lost any and all arguments. [Everything to a person - Integrity]
  • If truth can bring you down you must be stood on weak or false ground. If lie can bring you down then you must be stood on worse than scum!
  • Have you ever thought

    "True" church or true religion is a squabble between theists. Whatever it is people believe in must be of no problem to God. I bet He can speak very well the language of any man - any creature, actually. [A Universal God]
  • A man's gain may be another man's loss. A man's happiness may be another man's woe. A man's ease may be another man's sacrifice and misery.[Expropriation/Profiteering/Bureaucrat capitalism/Government corruption]
  • To err is human. That’s why it is not good habit to drop God’s name just to drive the self. It might be standing stinking shit aside Him. [Cashing-in on the gullible]

  • Man has sometimes relegated God to a mule. Religion and State need to separate. [Religions in politics]
  • Heroes are remembered for their greatness. The bad sides of them are all in the hidden files and folders. Villains are the other way around. Nobody is perfect.
  • Except for being a figure of speech, nothing is really absolute.
  • Some people are hard headed. They cannot be told once. Well, try and try again, who knows. [Big names that flopped in politics]

The 4th PGMA Impeachment

We have another round of impeachment filed, and this time received in congress, against President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo today. I have not seen the latest complaint, so mine are based on media reports regarding the matter. I don’t see any fresh information other than what people have already heard in the previous complaints, which all never made beachhead in congress due to TKOs.

Betrayal of public trust, Plunder, Treason.

I don’t think this Impeachment will work for its petitioners. Not under the circumstances, not by numbers, not by reasons. Impeachment is by large a political exercise. The political oppositions do not have the mathematical numbers that they need to win. But that’s no reason because, in theory at least, I believe there are situations that numbers can be override.

Impeachment is also by part a Rule of Law. I am a carpenter so I could not possibly be preempting congress. But I think, legally, the bases are a bit wild and overshoot. And, I am not a lawyer so I am not sure about legal terms, but this must be what they call fishing expedition – casting a net hoping the president is caught in there.

Hypothetical

oping the president is caught in there.egal terms, It looks to me like a fishing expedition casting anet The following are hypothetical. Let’s take plunder by GMA based on the alleged Fertilizer Scam. Facts are: That there was an amount intended for fertilizer-dole-out to farmers. That the appropriation came at a time for national election. That the appropriations were released to members of congress. That there were diversions of fund because not all of them were actually spent on fertilizer. That there were anomalies like overpricing in procurements of fertilizer.

Now, I don’t think that then Agriculture Usec Jocjoc Bolante, much more PGMA, can be nailed with them. Not a chance by reason unless people come up and swear that they were ordered by PGMA or by Mr Bolante themselves to divert, malverse, or pocket public money, or solid evidences to those effects. Without them everything is mere allegation based on pure presumption and belief. And, all other issues follow similar pattern and circumstances as that of the Fertilizer scam so. I don’t think we need to go into each of them in here, right now.

Culpability under Command Responsibility? Well, that’s another thing. But, is not that another or different information? And, used as basis for impeachment, is not this shooting too far, or putting the cart before the carabao? I mean, legally, why did not anybody get hold of any of those who diverted, malversed or pocketed public money and hear the story from them, first? It’s not grandeur but at least there is something real, solid that could be used for other purposes. Like Culpability by Command responsibility – doing nothing by superiors to abuses [same with incompetence] committed by those below them. Who knows there could be crime by conspiracy, mismo, like when one actually tried to cover up. But then at this point they are all speculations since there is nothing real at hand – something established, for prima facie evidence at least. Ok, maybe people have not heard everything yet from the petitioners.

Sure, Filipinos are no idiots. They know what are real and what are unreal. But we are talking about rule of law and not about spending time forever just in preliminaries or playing dice.

Related posts:

The President is asked to resign

Grandest Grandstanding or Dawn of Justice…

The Bolante Case, Updates

Advertisements

One Response

  1. […] removed for that. That simplifies matter and removes the taste of political persecution. Like, say, instead of trying to impeach PGMA for the fertilizer scam, why had not they proven first that there … More than half a decade later, Filipinos are not even sure if there was indeed that scam or […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: